The White Sox lost their 20th game in a row Sunday, as the Minnesota Twins scored eight runs in the first two innings and went on to beat the South Siders, 13-7.
Perhaps it was fitting that 20 runs were scored in the 20th consecutive loss, and the final out was made by No. 20 on the Sox roster -- newly acquired Miguel Vargas.
Here is the list of teams to accomplish this dubious feat:
- 1961 Philadelphia Phillies -- 23 straight losses
- 1988 Baltimore Orioles -- 21 straight losses
- 2024 White Sox -- 20 straight losses (and counting!)
- 1969 Montreal Expos -- 20 straight losses
- 1943 Philadelphia Athletics -- 20 straight losses
- 1916 Philadelphia Athletics -- 20 straight losses
- 1906 Boston Americans -- 20 straight losses
With this defeat, the Sox finish the season series against Minnesota with a record of 1-12. They also went 1-12 against the Kansas City Royals.
Overall against the "weak" American League Central Division, the Sox are 8-34.
The Sox are 60 games below .500 at 27-87. They are the first team to be 60 games below .500 on Aug. 4 since the 1899 Cleveland Spiders, who were 15-75 on Aug. 1 of that season -- and 16-78 on Aug. 4.
Yes, this is the worst team since the 1899 Cleveland Spiders.
The Sox are 0-16 since the All-Star break. They have been swept in six consecutive series. They are 0-65 when trailing after seven innings, and 0-71 when trailing after eight innings.
Pedro Grifol's managerial record is now 100 games below .500 at 88-188, yet he's traveling with the team to Oakland for this week's series against the Athletics. How many in a row must Grifol lose in order to get fired?
My sister is the head coach of my nephew's youth baseball team. She's coaching 11- and 12-year-old boys, but I'm pretty sure if she lost 20 games in a row, she'd be pushed aside and replaced by a different coach.
Somehow, that doesn't happen with the White Sox, who are supposed to be playing Major League Baseball, where you're judged on wins and losses.
Alas, there is no accountability here. There is also no hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment